Virtually anyone who chose to join the Bitcoin community knew about the 21 million bitcoin limit, and therefore supports it. Needless to say if traders notice that there are the resident "experts" who like to post deep answers to the simplest of questions. Fidelity is expected to file for a spot bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF), joining other major asset managers like BlackRock and WisdomTree. Securities and Exchange Commission warned that investments involving bitcoin might have high rates of fraud, and that investors might be solicited on social media sites. It's this social consensus that's very hard to break, thereby keeping the 21 million limit in place. Even in Bitcoin. The only thing preventing a simple code change that eliminates the 21 million bitcoin emission limit is the Bitcoin community itself. Putting aside the DAO, for the moment, do you think that the values held by other people in the Ethereum community differ fundamentally from these values? Obviously, Ethereum's values were not articulated well enough.

How do you respond to the argument that it the DAO attacker gets to move his funds, he might very well want to sell them off and crash the price in the process? Isn’t there a moral argument to be made that the community should undo a theft when there is the chance to do so? It seems that too many people in the community currently uphold a bit of a "get-rich-quick-regardless-of-the-consequences" value. As a result, the community ended up without any of the guiding principles to assess what’s right and what’s wrong in regard to the DAO debate. Immediately after the DAO crisis, Stephan Tual - one of the guys behind the DAO - and people connected to Stephan Tual started running a political campaign to justify the DAO bailout by any means necessary. The identity behind Satoshi has always been a mystery since the beginning of the Bitcoin story. Probably because in the beginning members of the project wanted to be very inclusive. Many individuals are beginning to see the possibility of earning money via the use of cryptocurrencies, and this trend can be seen all the way from the cold areas of Kazakhstan to the subterranean bars of Jakarta.<
/>

That's fine. Some people will see it as an opportunity to accumulate tokens - either because they believe that our vision of Ethereum platform has better chances, or just to diversify their bets on a future smart contract platform. Smart contracts operate under a set of conditions to which users agree. We believe in a strong separation of concerns, where system forks are only possible in order to correct actual platform bugs, not to bail out failed contracts and special interests. Even though it runs contrary to everything Ethereum initially proclaimed to stand for: "Code is Law," Ethereum as this trusted platform for smart contracts free from the human factor, and all that. A failed investment into unproven and insecure smart contract, https://youtu.be/BIAPa3rDN1E perhaps? Even if that's not so, just follow the links and you're smart enough to get started. Why does this theft get a special treatment, and the other theft not? From my point of view, the Ethereum Foundation became co-opted by special interests. Tether CTO: Ethereum as Money Can’t Compete with Bitcoin.
r />

In addition, we also treat when you can’t access Binance account, face trouble when send and receive money on Binance, or you want to access old Binance account. If 60 to 80 percent of users want to hard fork, they can hard fork. I can go on; Hans-Hermann Hoppe is your friend. Yes, users can choose to adhere to any rules they want to adhere to. In some cases, you might not want privacy, but transparency with Monero. The dollar, the euro, the renminbi and every other currency by definition has the same privacy features as Monero. The thought is that the currency are often traded across international lines with no difficulty or fees, the checks and balances would be distributed across the whole globe (rather than simply on the ledgers of personal corporations or governments), and money would become more democratic and equally accessible to all or any. A BNB-focused accelerator program between Binance Labs and BNB Chain to incubate projects; helping them grow more organically through coaching, grants/investment, and network support. As the market for cryptocurrencies grows, hackers are coming up with more complex ways to access consumers' money. A hot wallet is internet-connected, which exposes it to exploitation by hackers.